dancefloorlandmine: (POTD)
dancefloorlandmine ([personal profile] dancefloorlandmine) wrote2007-10-02 10:35 am
Entry tags:

[POTD] Pic of the Day



This was the result of [livejournal.com profile] hazyjayne suggesting some evening photography last week. We originally went to Somerset House, but the courtyard had been filled with marquees for a corporate event, so the next stop was Waterloo Bridge for some shots as dusk fell.

For this one the iXus 330 was propped on the helpful flat top of one of the metal poles that support the railings. Unfortunately the moon was clearer in the other photos (it's that bright splodge behind the clouds), but everything else was even fuzzier.

[identity profile] rich-r.livejournal.com 2007-10-02 09:48 am (UTC)(link)
That's an excellent photo - just a shame about the blurring. It's almost like the lens is fogged.

I wonder what the London skyline would be like without the tower cranes?

[identity profile] d-floorlandmine.livejournal.com 2007-10-02 09:51 am (UTC)(link)
I wonder what the London skyline would be like without the tower cranes?
Clearer? [grin]

That's an excellent photo
Ta!

It's almost like the lens is fogged.
Hmmm - where did I put those cleaning cloths? It might just be my camera desperately trying to stretch out the exposure to be able to take the photo - especially as I wasn't using a high ISO, in order to try to avoid grain.

[identity profile] rich-r.livejournal.com 2007-10-02 09:58 am (UTC)(link)
True - maybe a slight vibration at the camera during the longer exposure, as I doubt the buildings move significantly.

Tripods help - but if you're on something like a bridge with traffic on it, you can still get a certain amount of vibration up through the legs.

[identity profile] d-floorlandmine.livejournal.com 2007-10-02 10:04 am (UTC)(link)
as I doubt the buildings move significantly
Not too much, I think.

maybe a slight vibration at the camera during the longer exposure
Well, the only thing securing the camera to the top of the pole, over the Thames, was my hands (although I was attempting to use them as a clamp rather than supporting the camera on them), so ...

but if you're on something like a bridge with traffic on it, you can still get a certain amount of vibration up through the legs
I might ask how [livejournal.com profile] hazyjayne's shots came out - EOS-20D on a decent tripod, but with much longer exposures.

[identity profile] rich-r.livejournal.com 2007-10-02 11:05 am (UTC)(link)
Good tripods have rubber feet and cushioned joints to help damp out vibrations. But even so - if you put it next to a truck thundering past, it'll probably still shake a bit.

I hope you had the wrist strap round your hand, we wouldn't want a series of photos of the Thames - from underneath :)

[identity profile] d-floorlandmine.livejournal.com 2007-10-02 11:14 am (UTC)(link)
But even so - if you put it next to a truck thundering past, it'll probably still shake a bit.
There wasn't too much traffic - but I might have just managed to collect a passing bus. Or I just need better optics for distance ... or I shifted the camera slightly ...

I hope you had the wrist strap round your hand
Heh. Ohhhh yes ... I'm paranoid around rivers and big drops anyway ...