Nope - just ran through it again in my head. The classic combination of a while loop, without actually doing anything to the test expression. [nonchalant whistle] Nothing to see here. Please move along.
re your comment in redcountess's LJ in answer to my comment (which I now can't access it seems) - yes elephants are definitely the common reference when it comes to sprogs - er sorry - children.
[grin] Especially true where the gap between the floorboards is more of an amplification space ... didn't help that my bedroom cupboards are below the hall (down which they used to launch themselves in a long jump from the bottom of the stairs).
[grin] Well, it did actually need a test in the while() so as to not run the loop if not necessary - it's just that I forgot to write in the line to recalculate the relevant test value.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
while(1) {
no subject
no subject
for(;;)
is the classy way to do it :-)
no subject
(;;)
no subject
I have a morbid fear of leaving blanks in for statements.
no subject